Marketing and Research Consulting for a Brave New World
Subscribe via RSS

There’s a rule in creative problem solving, “never accept the first right answer”.

The second right answer is hard to come by.  It requires a good BS detector, perseverance at amassing facts, ferreting out case histories and then distilling all that into synthesized learning.  It must be compelling because you are challenging the incumbent; the first right answer.  The second right answer must come from knowledge.

In media, the first right answer seemed to be that consumers don’t want to be interrupted by advertising.  We heard, “The interrupt and repeat model is dead; it’s all about contagious conversation.”  If true, media chaos!  However, there is a second right answer and it is all available in a marvelous collection of 21 papers in the June issue of the ARF’s Journal of Advertising Research. In this issue, we have proven empirical generalizations that are based on thousands of industry examples.  Assumption and thought pieces didn’t make the grade; table stakes were hard facts analyzed in a scientific manner as judged by our two guest editors, noted professors Jerry Wind and Byron Sharp.

This issue came from a collection of 40+ papers presented at Wharton in December from media and marketing leaders from around the world, on both the practitioner and academic side.

I think it was a great watershed moment for our industry that we chose to take a different path and embrace knowledge.  It undeniably proves what research and analytics can bring to the table… a second right answer that can reshape marketing thought.

Those who are coming to AM 4.0 will get a copy of this Journal issue and hear a special panel of some of the authors (I am proud to be one of those).  Also, if your organization belongs to the ARF you will get copies of this issue.  Those who receive it will have an advantage in the pursuit of advertising effectiveness and efficiency. (The issue is also available for purchase if you are not a member and not planning to attend the ARF Audience Measurement conference.)

Oh by the way, here are just a few of the 21 empirical generalizations:

  • TV advertising works as well as in the past
  • A simple formula for setting ad budgets to maximize profit is offered
  • The impact on sales can be huge of online advertising that never involved a click
  • Proof that in-store digital signage can lead to double-digit sales lift and learnings about how to maximize impact
  • The average elasticity of sales to advertising is 0.1 (doubling advertising leads to a 10% immediate increase in sales), and the long-term multiplier is typically twice the short term effect.

Here’s to perseverance and second right answers.

In March, the ARF completed executive interviews among 19 research leaders representing large marketers and media companies. Overall, Research got a passing grade, but certainly didn’t make honor roll. While Research usually has strong executive support, as we dug down 1-2 levels, we saw something different. We heard that there was spotty support for research […]

Read more ...

On Tuesday, the ARF Online Research Quality Council presented detailed findings from an unprecedented US R&D project regarding online data quality, called “Foundations of Quality” (FoQ).  Beyond the fact that it was about $1MM in research, it was unprecedented and quite remarkable as 17 leading online panel companies cooperated with each other and with large […]

Read more ...

Here is an interview with Michael Perman, Senior Director of Consumer Insights, Levi Strauss & Co. who has trained over 7,000 on storytelling and who is conducting, with Pat Hanlon, the ARF Workshop, “Stories Inspire” on June 22nd in NY. The interview with Pat Hanlon can be found here. Joel: Michael, you are a huge […]

Read more ...

I came across a really interesting exchange of comments on Flickr (not Facebook or My Space or Twitter) from an irate person who joined an online research panel. There are 3 great lessons here: 1—how lack of dialogue can lead to a tremendous level of misinterpretation then distrust about a business’ motives, leading to active […]

Read more ...